@JeremyECrawford @mikemearls Help resolve a debate. By RAI should a caster be able to prop a 2h weap against his shoulder in order to cast?
— calebrus44 (@calebrus44) September 28, 2014
@calebrus44 @JeremyECrawfordOr is the fact that this was not intended the reason that q-staves are now versatile instead of two-handed? it’s fine – swapping around like that is part of the action IMO
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) September 30, 2014
@mikemearls @calebrus44 Yeah, I would allow it too. A two-handed weapon needs two hands to be used, but not necessarily two to be carried.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) September 30, 2014
@SimonsOrion @mikemearls @calebrus44Would this also cover Reaction Spells Yes.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) February 24, 2017
@ETallitnics @SimonsOrion @mikemearls @calebrus44So off turn you get a Reaction, and a free object interaction? Without breaking 5e? This isn't an open-ended object interaction. It's about using a 2-handed weapon.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) February 27, 2017
@calebrus44 @ETallitnics @SimonsOrion @mikemearlsHe’s basically saying that switching between 1 or 2 hands is a non-action. That's correct.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) February 27, 2017