@JeremyECrawford I am not sure how magic item analysis works with spellcasting. Count towards spells known limit or not? Save it for survey?

— Viktor Bengtsson (@vikke064) January 9, 2017

@vikke064 Take a look at the section "Spells Known of 1st Level and Higher," specifically the second paragraph.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 9, 2017

@BraxtonLocke @vikke064 I’m still not getting this, I’m dumb. But could you clarify a bit more if they count towards spells known or not? The paragraph I referred to mentions spells "from this feature," aka the Spellcasting feature.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 11, 2017

@vikke064 @BraxtonLockeI don’t know if “your spells” in the “spell slot” feature includes all artificer spells. If it excluded certain spells, it would say so.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 11, 2017

@vikke064 @BraxtonLockeHaving to read two features and a spell list closely is not clear writing. It is, indeed, necessary to read a feature carefully to understand how that feature works.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 11, 2017

@vikke064 @BraxtonLockeHaving to read one feature closely is fine. Having to cross reference one other and a list is not. Which feature required all those references to understand?

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 11, 2017

@JeremyECrawford I had to see that identify and detect magic were not on the spell list before I understood the spellcasting. I still don’t> >know if I would be able to cast detect magic using a spell slot. The domain spells, magical secrets etc are clearer.

— Viktor Bengtsson (@vikke064) January 12, 2017

@vikke064It says “your spells”, not artificer spells. Since I was unsure of the rest I was unsure of this too. Thank you for the feedback.

— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) January 12, 2017