@ChrisPerkinsDnD @JeremyECrawford can a vampire use legendary action to bite an non-restrained opponent or normal bite restrictions apply?
— Miguel A. Espinoza (@nahualrpg) November 13, 2015
Normal bite rules apply. https://t.co/HvZNEniAgk
— Christopher Perkins (@ChrisPerkinsDnD) November 14, 2015
A vampire's legendary action bite follows the same rules as its regular bite. #DnD https://t.co/7T0VzKRO9Z
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 13, 2015
@KirillHarchevCan you please clarify – Sorc 3 / Wiz 1 will prepare wizard spells accoriding to slots of wiz 1 or multiclass 4? #DnD wiz 1
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) December 5, 2015
My idea of intimacy. pic.twitter.com/Hgq1kgoy1Z
— Christopher Perkins (@ChrisPerkinsDnD) October 28, 2015
@ChrisPerkinsDnD What's your favorite critter to attack players with? pic.twitter.com/8yseVgMQkH
— Daniel Wair (@Chalkarts) October 28, 2015
Gelatinous cube! (Does that count as a "critter"?) https://t.co/RyJ96iXoqg
— Christopher Perkins (@ChrisPerkinsDnD) October 28, 2015
@JeremyECrawford @206Siro Doesn't Action Surge state that you can possibly get an extra bonus action? Is that the only exception?
— Matt aka Wally West (@TheThirdFlash) November 7, 2015
Action Surge refers to the fact that you might have a bonus action, not that you might have more than one. #DnD https://t.co/aWB9g5BlQx
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 8, 2015
@The_NonfictionWould you be able to use a spell like Hunter’s Mark/Hex with Glyph of Warding? Would the caster still need to concentrate?
Glyph of warding doesn't require concentration.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 9, 2015
@The_NonfictionNo as in using Glyph of Warding to store Hunter’s Mark/Hex via Spell Glyph option. Would that still require concentration? Check out the last sentence of the "Spell Glyph" section of glyph of warding's description.
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 9, 2015
@JeremyECrawford Heavily Obscured: Errata and updated Basic Rules are different "something obscured BY it" VS "something IN that area"
— Stefano (@elerital) December 9, 2015
The PH errata PDF describes corrections in a concise form. The Basic Rules and the PH include the full text. #DnD https://t.co/CE8Q63nN56
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 11, 2015
@JeremyECrawford Does that mean there is a edition in print?
— Simon Oberbrinkmann (@Dummyurd) December 11, 2015
Recent PH printings include corrections. Look on the credits page for "This printing includes corrections …" #DnD https://t.co/0xSCBElBlt
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) December 11, 2015
@JeremyECrawford Invi spell, has multi attack action, would you get adv on both attacks or become visible after first attack?
— Michael Thompson (@mkillroy) November 9, 2015
The invisibility spell ends on you with your first attack. #DnD https://t.co/97PXQ1QHPT
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 9, 2015
@mkillroy Thank you for responding, ending a month long debate in our group 🙂 I hope it was a friendly debate!
— Jeremy Crawford (@JeremyECrawford) November 9, 2015
@curbstompt13 @JeremyECrawford am I correct in assuming that unless a character makes a stealth check they can be targeted in darkness spell? yes, though at disadvantage
— Mike Mearls (@mikemearls) December 5, 2015
